ESTIMATION OF DRY AND ORGANIC MATTER DIGESTIBILITY OF SPROUTED BARLEY AT DIFFERENT AGES LABORATORY
Keywords:
digestibility, in vitro, dry matter, organic matterAbstract
Current study conducted to estimate the differences of in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD%) and in vitro organic matter digestibility (IVOMD%) of sprouted barley forage that planted at different period and harvested at two different maturity stages. Each treatment was randomly assigned to three replications. Results showed that in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) and organic matter digestibility (IVOMD) were higher in T1 comparing to T2. It was 77.41 and 78.46% while it was 66.11 and 66.64% in T2 respectively. In vitro levels of samples were showed to be lower in T2 than T1. Yield level of barley was significantly affected due to vegetation stage (p<0.01). It concluding prolonged the vegetation stage had significantly decrease digestibility of dry matter and organic matter.
References
J. M. A. Tilley and R. A. Terry, ‘A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops’, J. Br. Grassl. Soc., vol. 18, pp. 104–111, 1963.
J. Uyeda, L. Cox, and T. J. Radovich, ‘An economic comparison of commercially available organic and inorganic fertilizers for hydroponic lettuce production’. pp. 1–4, 2011.
I. Sayim and C. Balabanli, ‘Arpa çeşit ve hatlarının tane, silaj verimi ve verim komponentlerinin belirlenmesi üzerine bir araştırma’, Selçuk Üniversitesi Vet. Fakültesi Derg., vol. 20, pp. 93–104, 2006.
V. Anderson, G. Lardy, M. Bauer, K. Swanson, and S. Zwinger, ‘Barley Grain and Forage for Beef Cattle’, North Dakota Agricultural Experiment Station, AS 1609, 2012.
M. Fayed, ‘Comparative study and feed evaluation of sprouted barley grains on rice straw versus tamarix mannifera on performance of growing Barki lambs in Sinai’, J. Am. Sci., vol. 7, pp. 954–961, 2011.
G. Hervas, M. J. Ranilla, A. R. Mantecón, R. Bodas, and P. Frutos, ‘Comparison of in vitro digestibility of feedstuffs using rumen inoculum from sheep or red deer’, J. Anim. Feed Sci., vol. 13, pp. 91–94, 2004.
O. Canbolat, ‘Comparison of in vitro gas production, organic matter digestibility, relative feed value and metabolizable energy contents of some cereal forages’, J. Fac. Vet. Med. Kafkas Univ., vol. 18, pp. 571–577, 2012.
T. Y. Chung, E. N. Nwokolo, and J. S. Sim, ‘Compositional and digestibility changes in sprouted barley and canola seeds’, 1989.
Z. Raeisi, R. Tahmasbi, O. Dayani, M. A. Ayatollahi, and I. Tavassolian, ‘Digestibility, microbial protein synthesis, rumen and blood parameters in sheep fed diets containing hydroponic barley fodder’, J. Livest. Sci. Technol., vol. 6, pp. 9–17, 2018.
M. M. Farghaly, M. A. Abdullah, I. M. Youssef, I. R. Abdel-Rahim, and K. Abouelezz, ‘Effect of feeding hydroponic barley sprouts to sheep on feed intake, nutrient digestibility, nitrogen retention, rumen fermentation and ruminal enzymes activity’, Livest. Sci., vol. 228, pp. 31–37, 2019.
M. Ata, ‘Effect of hydroponic barley fodder on Awassi lamb’s performance’, J. Biol. Agric. Healthc., vol. 6, pp. 60–64, 2016.
A. N. Hafla, K. J. Soder, A. F. Brito, M. D. Rubano, and C. J. Dell, ‘Effect of sprouted barley grain supplementation of an herbage-based or haylage-based diet on ruminal fermentation and methane output in continuous culture’, J. Dairy Sci., vol. 97, pp. 7856–7869, 2014.
A. S. Alharthi, H. H. Al-Baadani, M. M. Abdelrahman, and I. A. Alhidary, ‘Effects of feeding different levels of sprouted barley on fermentation characteristics, bacterial quantification and rumen morphology of growing lambs’, Vet. Sci., vol. 10, no. 1, 2022.
H. Akbag, O. S. Turkmen, H. Baytekin, and I. Y. Yurtman, ‘Effects of harvesting time on nutritional value of hydroponic barley production’, Turk. J. Agric. Nat. Sci., 2014.
M. J. Al-Saadi and I. A. Al-Zubiadi, ‘Effects of substitution barley by 10%, 30% of sprouted barley on rumen characters, digestibility and feed efficiency in diet of Awassi male lambs’, Int. J. Sci. Res., vol. 5, pp. 2228–2233, 2016.
M. A. Karsli, H. Akdeniz, T. Levendoglu, and O. Terzioglu, ‘Evaluation of the nutrient content and protein fractions of four different common vetch varieties’, Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., vol. 29, pp. 1291–1297, 2005.
M. Arif et al., ‘Feeding barley and corn hydroponic based rations improved digestibility and performance in Beetal goats’, J. King Saud Univ. - Sci., vol. 35, no. 2, p. 102457, 2023.
A. S. Lithourgidis, I. B. Vasilakoglou, K. V. Dhima, C. A. Dordas, and M. D. Yiakoulaki, ‘Forage yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with oat and triticale in two seeding ratios’, Field Crops Res., vol. 99, pp. 106–113, 2006.
E. Y. Aguilar-Lopez, J. L. Bórquez, I. A. Domínguez, A. Morales-Osorio, M. G. Gutiérrez-Martínez, and M. G. Ronquillo, ‘Forage yield, chemical composition and in vitro gas production of triticale (× triticosecale wittmack) and barley (hordeum vulgare) associated with common vetch (vicia sativa) preserved as hay or silage’, J. Agric. Sci., vol. 5, pp. 227–238, 2013.
R. Devendar et al., ‘Growth performance, nutrient utilization and carcass characteristics of sheep fed hydroponic barley fodder’, Anim. Nutr. Feed Technol., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 321–331, 2020.
S. N. Ningoji, M. N. Thimmegowda, S. Tulja, and B. G. Vasanthi, ‘Hydroponics fodder production—an innovative approach for sustainable livestock production under varied climatic distress’, Mysore J. Agric. Sci., vol. 55, no. 2, p. 1, 2021.
P. K. Naik, B. D. Dhawaskar, F. Chakurkar, E. B. Swain, and N. P. Singh, ‘Nutrient changes with the growth of hydroponic cowpea sprouts’, Indian J. Anim. Nutr., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 357–359, 2016.
D. J. Peer and S. Leeson, ‘Nutrient content of hydroponically sprouted barley’, Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., vol. 13, pp. 191–202, 1985.
A. Ikram et al., ‘Nutritional and end-use perspectives of sprouted grains: A comprehensive review’, Food Sci. Nutr., vol. 9, pp. 4617–4628, 2021.
J. Chavan and S. S. Kadam, ‘Nutritional improvement of cereals by sprouting’, Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., vol. 28, pp. 401–437, 1989.
G. C. Marten and R. F. Barnes, ‘Prediction of energy digestibility of forages with in vitro rumen fermentation and fungal enzyme systems’, in Standardization of Analytical Methodology for Feeds, W. G. Pigden and others, Eds, Ottawa, ON, Canada: International Development Research Centre, 1980, pp. 61–71.
F. Girma and B. Gebremariam, ‘Review on hydroponic feed value to livestock production’, J. Sci. Innov. Res., vol. 7, pp. 106–109, 2018.
E. Tekce and M. Gul, ‘Ruminant beslemede ADF ve NDF’nin önemi’, Atatürk Üniversitesi Vet. Bilim. Derg., vol. 9, pp. 63–73, 2014.
E. Kun, Serin iklim tahillari. Ankara, Turkey: AU Ziraat Fakultesi Publications, 1988.
H. G. Helal, ‘Sprouted barley grains on olive cake and barley straw mixture as goat diets in Sinai’, Adv. Environ. Biol., vol. 9, no. 22, pp. 91–102, 2015.
A. M. A. Saidi and A. J. Jamal, ‘The biological and economical feasibility of feeding barley green fodder to lactating Awassi ewes’, J. Anim. Sci., vol. 5, pp. 99–105, 2015.
P. N. Hobson and C. S. Stewart, The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem, 2nd edn. London, UK: Blackie Academic and Professional, 1997.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
CC BY
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. CC BY includes the following elements:
BY: credit must be given to the creator.
